🔗 Share this article

During last year's presidential campaign, Donald Trump wooed the electorate with promises to lower prices immediately upon taking office. But, after his inauguration, there was precious little attention to affordability issues. This shifted after price-fatigued voters delivered a rebuke at the ballot box. Shortly thereafter, his team launched a hastily assembled campaign to address affordability. Unfortunately, this initiative is a disorganized endeavor—characterized by illogical claims, inconsistencies, magical thinking, scapegoating, and misleading statements.

Out-of-Touch Claims and Supermarket Reality

Just two days post-election, the president began his cost-reduction push with a disastrous remark: “Our groceries are way down. Everything is way down… So I don’t want to hear about affordability.” These words from billionaire Trump—who frequently associates with other ultra-rich individuals—demonstrated utter contempt for everyday citizens facing difficulties when visiting the grocery store. Essentially, he dismissed their struggles as trivial, implying they had it wrong about actual costs.

His assertion that everything was “way down” proved highly misleading and inaccurate. How could every price be falling when his cherished tariffs were pushing up costs? Official statistics indicate the cost of bananas increased 6.9% in the last twelve months, beef prices went up 14.7%, and the cost of coffee surged by nearly 19%—partly due to import taxes on Brazil’s coffee and beef. In the first three quarters, costs increased in the majority of main grocery groups tracked by the government’s price index, including animal proteins (up 4.5%), non-alcoholic beverages (increasing nearly 3%), and fruits and vegetables (up 1.3%).

Contradictions and Falsehoods in Economic Statements

In spite of the evidence, the president continues to push his misleading narrative about lower costs. Since election day, he has stated there is “virtually no inflation,” insisted “costs have fallen significantly,” and asserted “it is far less expensive under Trump than it was under his predecessor.” Such remarks ignore the fact that prices overall have clearly increased since Biden left office. At present, inflation is at a 3% annual rate, which is half again as much than the Federal Reserve’s 2% goal. In another falsehood, he claimed that gas prices had fallen to nearly $2 a gallon, even though government figures show they average $3.19.

Faced with actual conditions and declining opinion polls, some Trump aides apparently cautioned that his “prices are down” message made him sound dangerously out of touch from ordinary people. Many citizens are angry about prices continuing to climb following promises of decreases. In response, aides suggested one quick fix: reduce some of Trump’s beloved tariffs. The logical move contradicted the president’s unrealistic claim that new tariffs wouldn’t raise prices for American shoppers.

Suggested Fixes and Their Potential Impact

With certain taxes being rolled back on several food items, Trump will probably claim that he has cut prices once these products begin to fall in price. That would be like an arsonist boasting for extinguishing a blaze that he had started. On another occasion, when addressing McDonald’s executives, he stated that “we are in the golden age of America” and assured the audience that “costs are decreasing and all of that stuff.” These comments come naturally for a billionaire to make, but seem insincere to millions of Americans facing hardships—especially when many risk cuts to nutrition assistance or skyrocketing health premiums.

According to a recent poll from October, 74% of Americans believe the state of the economy are fair or poor, while just a quarter rate them positive. A separate survey showed that a majority of citizens say the administration’s actions have “worsened economic conditions” in the country.

Economic Truth and Suggested Measures

Scott Bessent, Trump’s top economic official, recently disputed assertions of a golden age. He noted that far from booming, some parts of the US economy “are in recession.” The manufacturing sector—which Trump vowed to save—seems to have shrunk for eight months in a row and shed around 33,000 jobs this year. Citing these challenges, the secretary called on the Federal Reserve to reduce borrowing costs—a move that could help affordability.

Reacting to public dismay about affordability, Trump proposed a direct payment of “a dividend of at least $2,000 a person” excluding “the wealthy.” To numerous struggling Americans, it seems like manna from heaven, but it is unlikely that Congress—already alarmed about large shortfalls—will approve the proposal. This idea could raise government expenditure, increase borrowing costs, and possibly fuel inflation by putting more money into consumers’ pockets.

A further supposed fix for affordability centered on introducing 50-year mortgages, based on the idea that this would reduce monthly mortgage payments. However, the truth is that such lengthy loans have minimal impact to lower monthly payments—frequently reducing them by just $100 or $200 each month. The downside is that these mortgages could more than double the overall cost borrowers pay and slow building home value.

Blaming the Previous Administration and Economic Prospects

In their affordability campaign, Trump and his team have once more blamed Biden for economic problems, including increasing costs. Officials claimed they “inherited a disaster from Joe Biden” and were “addressing the prior administration’s price hikes.” These are absurd and inaccurate claims. In reality, Biden handed over a robust economic situation, with low price growth, economic growth strong, and minimal joblessness. But, the current administration’s actions—particularly his tariffs—have created an difficult situation, pushing up prices and slowing GDP growth.

Per an economist, lead analyst at a research firm, numerous regions are experiencing economic decline, with their conditions worsened by the administration’s trade policies. Zandi fears that if key regions like major economies enter a downturn, the US could face a broad economic slump. In downturns, consumers generally possess less money to spend, and price increases usually declines. Unfortunately, with Trump’s much-ballyhooed cost initiative likely to do little to hold down prices, his most effective “tool” for improving living standards might end up pushing the nation into recession—something that struggling Americans really can’t afford.